Post-Keynesian macroeconomics since the mid 1990s: main developments

Towards Post - Keynesian Ecological Macroeconomics

The paper starts with a brief criticism of macroeconomic analyses of different schools of thought for their focus on economic growth and maximisation of output. This applies to the traditional Keynesian approach, which has focused on the achievement of sufficient aggregate demand to underpin full employment and full capacity utilisation, down-playing aggregate supply constraints. This also appl...

A Brief Introduction to Post Keynesian Macroeconomics

I begin by setting out the core of Post Keynesian macroeconomics, and then distinguish three schools within Post Keynesian theory: the fundamentalist Keynesian approach taken by Paul Davidson, the Kaleckian variant represented by Eckhard Hein, and Hyman Minsky’s financial instability hypothesis. I continue by identifying what Post Keynesian macroeconomics is not, and outlining some very substan...

Intermediate Macroeconomics: Keynesian Models

At the risk of some oversimplification, the leading alternatives to the neoclassical / real business cycle model for understanding short run fluctuations are Keynesian models. I phrase this in the plural because there are multiple different versions of the Keynesian model, which differ in terms of how the aggregate supply block of the economy is formulated. Whereas neoclassical models emphasize...

A Future for Keynesian Macroeconomics

Intermediate Macroeconomics: New Keynesian Model

Among mainstream academic economists and policymakers, the leading alternative to the real business cycle theory is the New Keynesian model. Whereas the real business cycle model features monetary neutrality and emphasizes that there should be no active stabilization policy by governments, the New Keynesian model builds in a friction that generates monetary non-neutrality and gives rise to a we...